An overview of the Input 1 requirements for the Edinburgh Award This initial stage of the Award introduces to students the journey they will go on and gets students to start planning for the personal development they want to see. This might be conducted as a group session, or as a series of self-directed tasks for the students to complete independently. What? Overview of Input 1 requirements Overview of Requirements Image Why? Rationale for Input 1 requirements Element 1.1 - Students collectively build a list of skills and abilities required for excellence in their activity Students consider the types of skills and abilities that they could develop within their particular activity. While staff will have previously created a list of the skills and abilities students are likely to develop it’s important that the students also do this to give them a sense of ownership over the list and thus encourage their engagement. Element 1.2 - If there are skills missing from the student list of skills then add these from the pre-prepared list created by staff running the individual version of the Award. This creates a comprehensive list of all the skills and abilities students are likely to develop through involvement in their activity. This is the list that all students on a version of the Award must self-rate against at Inputs 1, 2, and 3. These skills are not about increasing knowledge of a topic e.g. coding or learning a language but are skills which can be developed and adapted for different contexts. Element 1.3 - With help from staff, students place skills under the relevant Graduate Attribute headings Students then decide which skills sit under which Graduate Attribute heading. This task is included partly because one of the University’s aims for the Award is that it allows students to recognise that the development of Graduate Attributes is important to the University and that the activities they are doing are one way to develop those. Additionally, this exercise should also benefit students’ understanding of each skill because by placing them under the headings of Communication, Personal Effectiveness, Research and Enquiry or Personal and Intellectual Autonomy this requires the students to really consider exactly what the focus is for each skill they identify. Element 1.4 - Students self-rate against this full list of skills and abilities which has now been jointly created by staff and students Students do this at each of the three stages because it encourages them to consider how they are developing overall as well as in the areas they are focussing on. The purpose of this is not necessarily for students to move themselves from low to high on the scale by the end of their Award experience but rather is about instilling a self-awareness in students and to help increase their understanding of where they sit in terms of their ability across the fuller list of skills. It can be quite normal for students’ rating to drop initially as they develop a greater understanding of what constitutes ‘good’ for a skills, prior to then increasing as they focus on developing it. Element 1.5 - Of this full list of skills students choose three to actively work towards developing throughout their Award journey While students are likely to develop many skills during their time doing the activity, by narrowing the focus to just three skills for the purposes of the Award, we can expect them to purposefully work towards developing each of these. Over the course of the Award, we expect students to: consider why they have chosen a particular skill, to actively seek opportunities to develop each skill, to reflect on the learning that has come about as a result of their development and to translate that learning into other contexts such as their studies or other activities they may be involved in. Once students have chosen their three skills they need to stick to these skills – they can’t for instance decide to change the skills they’re working on at Input 2. This is because students should be actively working towards developing their skills right through the Award journey. Input 2 gives students experiences of taking stock and revising plans on how to work on each skill, before going on to implement these revised plans and continue reflecting on progress. If students were able to change skills at Input 2 they would lose this opportunity. If the experience they’re involved in stops offering opportunity for one of their chosen skills to be developed, then the student should look to other areas of their lives where they can work on its development. At this stage students should create an action plan of how they intend to develop their three skills, taking account of challenges they can anticipate. This may well be amended at Input 2 as a result of the learning that takes place during the first half of the Award journey. Element 1.6 - Students consider impact – how they might be able to have impact on those around them. Students should also be introduced to the concept of impact at this point. While for some students it will be too early for them to be able to really consider how they might have impact it’s important that they begin thinking about it at this early stage. By doing so, they can be considering and working towards increasing their impact before they get to Input 2 when they will be required to reflect back on their progress so far. Students should be helped to understand that impact doesn’t have to be world changing – it might be quite small, simple things but it is important that students become aware of the impact they can have on others and work to increase this. How? Input 1 - Requirements and examples of how to approach them Examples of practice Element Example 1 Example 2 Online example Students are introduced to the Award process If an Input 1 session is being held this information can be given to students verbally within the session. You might choose to share this with students via an online space or document before a session. This information might be shared via an online space that students have access to where they work through the Input 1 requirements individually. Building list of skills - Students shouldn’t be presented with the list of skills from your Framework until they have completed this task to ensure they are able to contribute their ideas this list and so the ultimate list is collaborative between staff and students. Every version of the Award uses a tailored list of the skills and abilities relevant to that activity. Students are given post-its and asked either individually or in pairs to come up with skills they think are relevant for their role/activity and capture those on the post its. Use an online voting system like Top Hat where students use a device to submit skills and these are projected onto a screen. Use breakout groups to have students discuss this. Appointed spokesperson feeds back to the whole group. If there are gaps, plug any gaps in the list of skills with the list created by staff Have all pre-prepared skills on post-its and include them where required or prepare post-its in the session. Where whole group have shared examples of skills, verbally explain that thinking was done before the session and while the lists are very similar there were a couple of additional skills staff thought of, add them into the list. Award Leader adds in any missing skills either verbally or using whiteboard function if skills have been captured. Skills placed under GA headings A flip chart sheet for each of the four Graduate Attribute headings are placed around the room and student take the post-its they have previously written and place them under the correct heading, clustering similar skills together. Undertaken as an exercise in plenary, Award Leader has headings written onto a board and students shout out where they think the skills sit. Use a whiteboard function and have each spokesperson write the group’s skills under the relevant headings or write an acronym for the relevant heading against each skill. Students choose three skills to work on In pairs or small groups students consider the skills they want to develop and discuss possible approaches they might take to develop them. Individually students reflect on the skills most relevant to them. Use breakout groups to do this as a peer-to-peer conversation. Students consider impact on others In pairs or small groups students consider how they might have a positive impact on others given their role/activity. Students reflect on a person who has had a positive impact on them – what did they do to have that impact, how could the student replicate that. Use breakout rooms for small group discussion on impact. Students create an action plan for their development. This gets submitted to the Award Leader but is not shared with the central Award Team Based on peer conversations in the session students might start to draft this withn the session. You might ask students to go away and submit this document alongside the three skills they have chosen to develop. Students might be asked to work through a structured action planning prompt sheet. Submissions (Output 1) to Award leader as a result of this Input and to gain entry to Input 2 Self-assessment against full list of skills and abilities Three chosen skills to work towards developing Action plan for skills development Once the above have been submitted the Award leader needs to send a list of the students (names and UUNs) who are doing the Award to the central Award team. Please note we only count students as being on the Award once the above have been submitted to the Award leader. Resources for Input 1 Self-rating and action planning templates – under Student Submissions>’Self-rating and goal setting templates’. This article was published on 2024-05-06